there is no society without unequal dynamics due to the tragic view of life. Some countries are resource poor and some are rich. commerce tends to equalize this on the grand scale to the point that 100s of millions today have luxuries like ac and indoor plumbing few kings had access to.

on the contary, the austrians adovocated for multiple competing currencies and were against money without backing and artificial high inflation. Floating exchange rates and consumer choice would tend to favor good money.

yes the whole anarchocapitalism exposed by david friedman is that voluntary private agencies much like how insurance is done could be subscribed to enforce property rights. in some cases low crime or in an area might make them unecessary but just like insurance you could choose to buy when and how much you needed.

you either have lawlessness or communism either way someone is not free to keep the fruit of thier own labor. Marx thought the the worker doesnt keep 100% doesnt make sense because the worker produces in one dimension but consumes in many. If the worker is paid 100% instead of 10% then the hand made clothing costs 10xs as much and he has no savings do to specialization.

The whole genius of a market economy is its voluntarism and uncentralisation yet its order.

But fixing the money, not protecting monopolies, and removing coercive violence and downsizing government so that negative rights not positive are emphasized would be an immese recovery of both wealth and personal liberty.