The DNC/BLM circus act still ended up being infiltrated by police state elements, as we both agree. Those were the same elements responsible for most of the violence/looting/rioting for very simple reasons. The main one of which is that - like what's happening after the Jan 6 "protest" - the police-carceral-surveillance state uses it as an excuse to grab more powers for itself.

The 1960s CRM was I'd say 98% peaceful and it ultimately worked - things did change against the will of several powerful groups and interests. I really don't know how you can deny or ignore that.

Regardless, I insist that we are in agreement on the current state of affairs. The DHS was cooked up under the Bush/Cheney regime and since that time neither party has lifted a finger to do away with it. Instead they've only bought more bullets. And I think you'd probably agree with me as well that if you got ENOUGH people involved in a massive peaceful protest movement that actually forced them to stand up and take notice, something - probably quite small in actuality - would likely change. We are also in agreement where it comes to what it will take to actually make real changes at this juncture - massive organized deadly violence. It wouldn't have to be centrally coordinated even.

But back to the Soros part - You do realize that he's an arch capitalist in line with Klaus Schwab and the whole "you'll own nothing and be happy" or whatever the fuck that quote was, right? Soros is maybe a little more "clever" than some of the others in that he glommed onto the woke shit much earlier, not just here in the US, but in other countries too. I think Hungary has kicked anyone affiliated with his organizations dafuq out of their country as a result. But he wants the same thing as all of the moneyed power elites want: an easily governable populace, preferably all governed by an unelected supra-national "one-world" (or one-region) government. This benefits the top of the capitalist financial-corporate class. And they need more police and more bullets to keep the thing in check.

In any case, this has been a tangent, but an interesting one for me anyway. I don't take offense to your concluding statement because it strikes me more as a good way to dismiss someone who actually believes shit like the BLM Floyd protests will accomplish anything, which I don't for multiple reasons (including the baked in underlying point that 98% of the idiots who participated probably don't even understand which is that they were being played like a fiddle by the likes of Soros while they were being infiltrated by gov't agents looking to cause havoc and justify increased PD budgets and the like). Plus I've never even sniffed anything close to a trust fund, and I doubt either of us would turn one down if it was offered unexpectedly, LOL.