This is the first time I have heard the case framed this way. The way you have framed it, I agree with you. But this is certainly not the way that the media understood it (at least no media I am aware of) and is evidently not the way the more left-leaning judges understood it. Are you sure she was willing to serve trans, etc. It certainly didn't sound that way in her public statements. Were all of these folks being deliberately misleading?

By the way, when I have a constitutional question, I always refer to the US Constitution Center, based in Philly. An amazing resource. Jeffrey Rosen does an amazing job.