Prof Norman Fenton recently on X linked my Tribunal results with those of Dr Clare Craig… let me explain.

Professor Norman Fenton was my witness when I took the MHRA and ICO to First Tier Tribunal to get the Yellow Card Vaccine Monitor pregnancy data after June Raine (retired CEO MHRA) had boasted about this data in November 2022.

Initially we were sent an Interim Report which showed 41% of pregnant ladies (1350 by July 2021), had at least 1Adverse Drug Reaction.  MHRA had presented this fact to the PEAG, a committee which assess drug risks and they said nothing.

Prof Fenton wrote wherearethenumbers.subs… before I decided to appeal. 

During this long process to get raw pregnancy data, MHRA published a Preprint of their Monitor findings. The Chief Safety Officer (Alison Cave) 

and Deputy Director Patient Safety Monitoring, (Phil Tregunno) were two of the authors: medrxiv.org/cgi/content…medrxiv.org/cgi/content…. 

Can I say the MHRA was developed out of the Medicines Act 1968 and the Thalidomide Scandal to ensure drugs were safe in pregnancy. Covid-19 vaccines were the first drugs to be given to the pregnant at the same time as the public in general.

The judgement stated, “The MHRA and indeed the Commissioner had accepted that the public Interest was weighted in favour of the release of the information”

“But this had to be balanced against the need to have proper analysis of all the data and a considered overview of safety.”

“The publication of the raw data………..could easily be misused, misquoted or misunderstood.”

And it states, “Misinformed hysteria about the vaccine may equally put lives at risk.”

I had a team of highly qualified analysts who were more than capable of analysing this data and they were appalled at the MHRA’s analysis.  

This is my Substack  substack.com/home/post/…, which summarised how poor the MHRA analysis was. 

I didn’t crowd fund to get legal help, I did it myself, but I firmly believe no matter how expert the legal input is, they will not release the raw data. 

The preprint was on the 36,604 in the Monitor not just the 2,517 who were pregnant. The MHRA state in their Preprint:

“15,764 (52.1%) of those reporting vaccination, reported experiencing at least one adverse reaction. However, nearly all were expected acute reactions 

and ONLY 4,134 (13.7%) reported an event considered medically serious”.

The “only” is my emphasis.  But 1 in 7 (13.7%) having a serious medical event!!  MedDRA classifies a serious event as:

• DEATH

• LIFE-THREATENING

• HOSPITALISATION

• DISABILITY (may be permanent)

• CONGENITAL

Is this the first time a Regulator or as they call themselves Enabler has quantified the disastrous level of adverse reactions?