You would first have to contend with the issues that it isn't obvious at all that a state of abandon even existed, or that each of the claims about the ubiquity of abuse were valid, and then decide that it is more desirable to segregate on gender based on this narrative (which isn't possible), establish the norm of males as second class citizens, possessed of less legal rights than women, or - to hazard the risk that some assaults occur and even that most are not resolved.

This is of course true for men as well as women.