You don't cover Georgia, but I did my own amateur analysis of that state and found a consistent anomalous pattern. In a large number of red counties, Trump's percentage margin of victory goes down from 2020 but the vote total goes up dramatically. He still wins these counties despite his percent of the vote going down. The vote total differences are often extreme. The biggest is Jackson county in which his victory margin goes down by 2.93% but the vote total goes up by 20.23%!

I think this means that Harris was making these counties more competitive, dropping Trump's percentage of the vote significantly. Thus, they had to add drop-off votes to make up for it and maintain Trump's victory. The alternative explanation that Trump is just mega popular doesn't fly, because if people were turning out in bigger numbers because they were excited about his campaign, why would his margin of victory go down? Even more suspicious: if you add up all the extra votes in these counties, they are very close to his margin of victory for the state.

In the blue counties, you see the opposite phenomenon, and Harris's percentage margin of victory goes down slightly or stays the same, while the total number of votes goes down. I suspect this makes up the rest of what Trump needed to take him over the line and out of the margin for automatic recounts.

These numbers appear to be designed to make us think that Trump is just super popular, more than 2016 or 2020, more than ever and somehow this was hidden from us during the campaign. But none of it comports with the known facts and observations during the campaign.