I've been saying this for months now. This was a complete hack job to sell a certain narrative, one that would satisfy Trump's enormous ego. Harris was turning states like Ohio, Iowa, Texas, and Florida purple again. I'm not saying she would have won them, but she was making them competitive. We all saw it in the enthusiasm ahead of time. So, they couldn't just hack the swing states like Wisconsin, Michigan, NC, Georgia, Arizona, etc., because it would have looked really weird if OH, TX, FL, etc. got really close and yet he easily won the swing states.

Ahead of time, they hacked the polling aggregates with all kinds of fake polls to seed the idea that the election was a dead-heat and to lend plausibility to the idea that Trump could win. Then they hacked nearly every state to give Trump a victory that made it look like he was suddenly super popular. (Despite the fact that he hadn't won any election since 2016 and then only barely.)

The Ann Selzer poll was probably right. It had Harris up by 3 in Iowa, but Trump won the state by 8. (By the way, that's the same amount of swing as in Webb County Texas, 11 points.) That's why Trump wants to sue Ann Selzer, because it's a very reputable poll that has seldom been wrong and it's the only thing that isn't fitting in with his artificially produced narrative.