And yet they did turn out in record numbers. The early voting record for Georgia was broken halfway through the early voting period. How do you break turnout records and end up with 3 million fewer votes? You're saying they turned out for Trump which makes no damn sense at all when he was loonier than ever, people were walking out of his rallies, and his hasn't won a single election since 2016. By all accounts, his popularity was waning, not waxing. On the face of it, there'd at least need to be some explanation for why his popularity supposedly soared enough for him to run the table over all the swing states when his ratings were terrible. You don't get to say the polls were correct when it comes to the nationals and the swings states and wrong when it comes to favorability. You can't have it both ways.

No hate here. You can project onto me all you want, but that doesn't mean a damn thing. I don't hate Russians. And your point that we're close to an all-out war is all the more reason for them to interfere in our elections. Are you so naive to think that they wouldn't prefer Trump to Harris? For certain he'll go easier on them to say the least. In any case, I wasn't even saying that Russia did it so much as saying that the tactics used were the same. In other words, someone was taking notes.

But I'd be happy to be proven wrong. Let's just do a manual hand recount of all the paper ballots in the swing states and found who's right and who's wrong. Perhaps there's multiple potential explanations for all of these anomalies, but the fact that they're there and were extremely rare or not present in other elections makes it worth checking out.

But somehow I suspect you're going to argue against that, aren't you?