It is a moral courage issue, you've just come to internalize that moral cowardice is "basic sensibility and intelligence." I'm not anon, the demonic left hasn't destroyed me. Doing what is right when there is no risk is easy, when there is risk, it is difficult and takes moral courage. In the long run the legitimacy of Harvard is at stake here. If these undergrads want the good reputation of the institution to survive, then they'll need to quit hiding and be exemplars of excellence. To be excellent, you must speak truth to power, a power that is hopelessly corrupt cannot stand without destroying everything around it. The longer it takes to circulate this power, the worse things will get for everyone. By staying anon they stay aligned with a regime oriented towards destruction. We need smart young people who can see blatant hypocrisy and incompetence for what it is, and communicate about that effectively if we're to turn things around. I'm not seeking entertainment, I'm seeking a world where all of the power brokers aren't spiritually and morally bankrupt, and to get to that world people will need to take risks. Your assumption that taking any risk in this regard will necessarily result in destruction is indicative of utilitarian consequentialist thinking. It isn't true and promotes the worst kind of behavior and degradation of character.