The home for great culture
Anandamide, the more the merrier. On a seemingly unrelated note, I'm sure you have seen the Schmelling study from Denmark.
And the discussion about it here: dailysceptic.org/2023/0…
In this article, the table is important, but there are two paragraphs worth noting:
"The scientists, Dr. Gerald Dyker, Professor of Organic Chemistry at the Ruhr University Bochum, and Dr. Jörg Matysik, Professor of Analytical Chemistry at the University of Leipzig, are part of a group of five German-speaking scientists who have been publicly raising questions about the quality and safety of the BioNTech vaccine (as it is known in Germany) for the last year and a half."
and
"Finally, we have the ‘yellow batches’ clustered around the yellow line, which, as can be seen above, barely gets off the x-axis. On Dyker’s calculation, the yellow batches represent around 30% of the total. Dyker notes that they include batches comprising some 200,000 administered doses which are associated with literally zero suspected adverse events.
As Dyker puts it, “malicious” observers might note that “this is how placebos would look”."
It was a "slovenian anti-vaxxer - malicious observer" who stupidly palmed herself off as a head nurse, so it was debunked primarily on the basis that she misrepresented herself, but also that it couldn't cause cancer. Here is a short clip from the video talking about the different batches..
Maybe Dyker took note, because she put the long video up in July 2021.
But this malicious observer noted that the Pfizer vaccine came in three lots.. Number 1 was placebo, which was 30% of the total shots, number two was mRNA and number three was mRNA plus oncogene (which she described as adenovirus, so she got that wrong as well) . She also said that politicians were getting number 1 vials, and in the longer version of this video, she said that the three different jabs applied to the whole of europe, and they were using the recipients of the 30% saline injections as the basis for a placebo controlled study.
From her point of view, it would have been better had she told the whole truth, particularly about who she was, however, it would seem that whoever her sources were, who she refused to reveal..., just might have been on to something.....