Steve, you wrote in your summary, "So if you keep asking me for papers showing both isolated and purified, I will keep responding, there aren’t any for both, and that’s irrelevant." If isolation and purification are not required, and even irrelevant, then all we need to do is rely on statements of experts who say something has been isolated or purified. We don't need to actually prove anything, just say it. Covid-19 vaccines are 100% safe and 100% effective, many professionals say that. We don't need to prove it, that would take to much time and besides, it's irrelevant. Of course, I do not believe that statement. If we are to ignore Koch's Postulates, then anything can exist if an expert or group of experts say something exists. Koch's Postulates used to be the standard. My questions to you Steve are, "Why would you accept the assertion that SARS CoV-2 exists without proof? What is your opposition to requiring proof? Seems to me that abandonment of the requirements for proof are a boon for vaccine manufacturers. They simply need to have their experts declare a new disease every year, forget proving it exists, that takes too much time and it is irrelevant because an expert or experts said so.