You’d think maybe the governments that are paying for what appears to be an out of specification (non-compliant) product would be interested in a refund. Or, if they think it is truly safe and effective at least getting a replacement i.e. what they actually paid for and approved in the first place. Instead they pretend the problem doesn’t exist, and a bunch of arm chair critics come out trying to refute your findings with a bunch of what ifs.

Like you say, the easiest way to refute your findings is to actually pick up a pipette and doing the testing that would prove you wrong.