This debate mirrors exactly the attempts of the SJW to make social justice issues a part of the science policies needed to combat climate change. Social justice and science policy must be kept separate for these reasons: social justice is an ARBITRARY concept, based on political ideology, and as such is open to debate,dissent, definition and alternative proposals. Science is based on objective evidence, confirmation, replication and eventually consensus and is NON ARBITRARY. To rely on social justice ideology to solve scientific problems would be like relying on superstition and conspiracy theories rather than on doctors and medical research to combat the corona virus. A public consensus on social justice matters would take too much time to be found and implemented in any case, and failure to involve the public would take into the Stalinist realm of the last century, where political ideology supplanted impartial science and Lysenkoism threw the soviet union into scientific Dark Ages.