My "emotional commitment" is to truth, honesty and evidence. The history of nuclear power manifests none of these for those who care to do serious research rather than believing your peer group. Those who promote nuclear energy need to divulge the sources of their opinions as well as any conflict of interest. Nowadays confirmation bias is the rule: believe what conforms to your own prejudices or opinions. The definition of "safe" has yet to be objectively determined. In any event this whole discussion is meaningless inasmuch as nuclear power will never be revived in this country and has little future elsewhere due to costs and public skepticism..which is quite justified regarding any complex technology the failure of which has such enormous negative consequences.