I have to admit that I very much enjoyed the podcast. Two points were most relevant to me - the arc of evolving one's position on complex issues (and how hard that must be when you are in the vortex of it) and how that arc is impacted by a movement going from raising awareness to figuring out how to solve it. Clearly Lorna has a different take on the "how" but I do respect Zion's pivot and her willingness to allow pragmatism into the conversation. The ultimate question of nuclear power's place in the solution seems to still up for debate.

Additonally and on a related but different point, I struggle mightily with the strategies employed in order to attract attention for a given cause. There are just too many 'valid' competing interests. Prioritization/alignment are hyper-critical to make a dent in any collective action issue. Yelling and screaming louder via theatrical/violent one-upmanship seems like a poor methodology to use to determine that prioritization. Science? Institutions? I'd love to hear a better answer on how to get this part right while minimizing the pain, angst and suffering along the way. Perhaps one set of facts might help?!