Yes, I think this is important as well. There's a sense in which we're seeing now the degree to which it's a "rules-based order" and to which it's a "US-based order", and the notion of weaponization of rules is ... revealing in that regard! (Perhaps the rules could have been more carefully crafted, for instance.) The coalitional politics of this are similarly interesting, as you note: where DOES one find a pro-open-hegemonic coalition?