I know the official story of the Beirut bombing. I just believe all the main powers preferred not to "blow up" the story by proving it was indeed a nuclear bomb.

I am convinced nukes are real, so I am not going to be proving otherwise.

As to Miles Mathis, I find his physics work fascinating, but as to falsifying history, he believes an enormous amount of events are fake, or the official story is wrong. I've decided to not read him on history anymore (unless his case somehow seems to be getting stronger).