Your writings are certainly interesting and may well be the best approach to ultimately safeguarding the citizenry that I have seen. The largest difficultly appears to be the complexity of actually implementing such extensively interlocking systems. Regrettably, the citizenry has difficulty with even simple concepts and the general lack of education is one of the fundamental causes of our current problems.
I am particularly interested in a few of your points. One is what do you consider to be the fundamental set of rights of citizens that will always be theoretically guaranteed? I say theoretically because it is all too clear that statements of rights can be easily abused by ignoring portions or by willful misinterpretation of the clear intent. The other point is the "last resort" civil action you refer to if all of the relevant layers above it fail. How does such civil action work in the face of layers above that are equipped to use force to put down a purported rebellion (with the side question of how you tell the difference between a legitimate rebellion to enforce rights and a rebellion to defend the removal of guaranteed rights (with, of course, every attempt to mischaracterize the removal of said rights)).
Thanks, and looking forward to seeing where this group will go.