I think that, too. It always is prevailing because no matter what people say or think, reality is occurring. However, sometimes our thoughts/feelings do define reality. This statement is controversial in linguistics. For example in some languages 2 colors have the same name. For example, blue and green, might both be called bluegreen. Are people in these languages less able to distinguish blue from green? There are MANY different kinds of blue--should we give all of them a different name? I listened to a lecture with Jordan Peterson interviewing Cloe, a young woman who transitioned around age 13--and then detransitioned. She was told that she had gender dysphoria and having puberty blockers, testosterone and surgery would make her feel better. (They did not.) Her parents were told she would die (suicide) if she did not have these expensive procedures. In a way her situation is similar to mRNA people with adverse reactions. She was told to take these treatments and they would prevent gender dysphoria (prevent Covid in the case of mRNA). The scientists claim there are no adverse reactions from puberty blockers and testosterone and mastectomy and there are no adverse reactions from mRNA vaccines--or any vaccine, for that matter. If someone complains--well they made it up, well they are mentally ill, well it's so rare that it can be dismissed. We must censor this experience because it might block other people from getting this therapy that WE KNOW WORKS. Those in authority--especially those whose role is to heal, to provide public health, etc.--they don't want to admit harm. They CANNOT admit harm. I am so sad as I write this. Yes, I think the truth often prevails. But for those who died or got disabled from mRNA vaccines--the truth prevailed too late to save them. Nevertheless, I often say this: Hang tough. Eventually signals will become too strong to deny or supress. Happy New Year.