The “appeal to authority fallacy” has become a hallmark to help us identify the corruption in all kinds of areas. Matras like “Trust the Science” or “Vaccine Deniers” or “Conspiracy Theorists” or even the 1984-esque “Fact Checkers” have all become calling cards of the corrupted systems and their shepherds.

When we hear about whole swaths of science and academia who are afraid to defend their positions in debate, it becomes even more obvious.

Now, millions of dollars have been raised for a simple debate over the science behind vaccine safety. Yet the scrutiny is being shunned. In fact avoiding the debate is now being defended by the corporate media in such a dishonest way, saying things like “You should not give them the moral equivalence.” Claiming it is below their authority to even consider a debate. Saying things like “Imagine debating with a flat Earther.”

This is laughable of course because for $2.6 million dollars - or whatever has been raised at this point - any one of us would happily debate a flat Earther, no matter how pompous we believed our level of authority was.

There is only one real explanation for their squirming cowardice: They have been corrupted.

(Note: this is an excerpt from our article tomorrow, but it complements The Good Citizen article here. Subscribe for free (100%) if you want to see the whole thing and help us SOLVE the problem.

All problems are solvable.