My intent there wasn't to take a stance on who it applies to and to what degree, but rather just to observe that the justifications used for both rioting and vigilantism were the same: the contention made for both is that society isn't meeting its civil obligations in particular ways, and so resorting to pre-civilized methods of recourse is both necessary and justified. I'm suggesting that's a commonality. What it means is something I'm not entirely done working out. But it seems significant to me that large swaths of our citizenry, even those in opposition to one another in some ways, believe that serious civil obligations aren't being met.