62 Comments

Why for over 70 years olds? Are we expendable? This poison should not be given to anyone.

Expand full comment
founding

Dr Alexander, As a 72 year old I take great exception to your heading. My body has had 72 years to build a pretty robust immune system or have I been misreading your posts? 72 years to build a rich metaphysical life, a ton of wisdom through experience (some excruciatingly painful others powerfully wonderful). The world right now needs experienced humans who have their shit together and can guide those who don't. Lets drop the age criteria because I know I am physically and psychologically stronger than some people who are 30 years younger. And I am needed so lets not kill me. Sending light and love your way, MJ

Expand full comment

There is no emergency.

There never was an emergency.

Expand full comment

Dr. Alexander NO, NO ONLY be used for high risk e.g. 70 years and older with medical conditions! Jabs DO NOT work for the elderly and YOU KNOW THAT.

Expand full comment

Absolutely, This whole exercise has been a perversion of the notion of EUA.

Expand full comment

WHY do you want to give the shots to ANYONE? The assertion that giving it to over 70s is acceptable

absolutely destroys your argument that it is dangerous!? Please explain?

Expand full comment

We do not need the FDA to stop anything. To think they care even a tiny bit about us is very naive. We need to stop looking for someone to save us. It is up to us to REFUSE TO COMPLY. Stop taking the dang shots. If your employer requires the jab then you need to organize and get every employee to walk out. Same with schools and education. Pull your kids and watch how fast the school does what parents demand. Not ONE Republican or ONE Democrat is going to save us. Not going to happen. No matter what happens in November they will not save us. Have you heard even ONE Republican demand that Congress repeal the 1986 National Children’s Vaccination Act? No. Not one. Not Marjorie Taylor-Green, Matt Getz, Rand Paul, Sen. Johnson.....not ONE. As long as big pharma can mass murder people without any penalty why should they stop?

Expand full comment

Excuse me? We should give a jab to the elderly who are already hanging on by a thread??? We should give them a shot that will finally take them over the rainbow bridge?? Their immune systems are already compromised so we should give them a jab that furthers the weakening of their immune system. It is the older folks getting cancer after getting these shots not the teenagers. NO ONE should get this shot. NO ONE!!1

Expand full comment

It is time to start asking why all those who have had four injections and had covid at least twice after four injections are now consenting to a fifth injection. People cannot be this naive. Believe me if someone tried to pull the wool over these same people when it came to their finances, they would never fall for it! We must stop treating those who just keep taking EUA drugs with no safety or efficacy data, as victims. Sadly, they are consenting for their fifth jab for all the wrong reasons, and most know this.

Expand full comment

Hey Paul.

Kind of got your ass handed to you on this one from us "Senior Citizens".

Go Grey Power !!

Expand full comment
Sep 6, 2022·edited Sep 6, 2022

Doesn’t seem like “blood damage” would be okay for 70 year olds?

“Blood damage that has been detailed through sophisticated research methods is the “missing link” to explain many negative health conditions ranging from heart problems, cancers, reduced immunity, and death.  Blood damage is the key biologic explanation for harmful vaccine impacts.”

“In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated.”

https://thebluestateconservative.com/2022/09/03/warning-if-youve-had-a-covid-vaccine-booster-what-this-article-presents-may-cause-you-stress-and-anxiety/

Expand full comment
Sep 6, 2022·edited Sep 6, 2022

Why not go to Federal Court and get an injunction based upon factual evidence there is no emergency; that the EUA is therefore void on its face and should be voided or formally adjudicated as void.

Not a lawyer, obviously. Still, it seems rather straight up from a regulatory perspective.

In a lawful society of reason and accountability, one cannot allow fiat declarations of "emergency" that have lost their factual basis and exist only in a capricious and arbitrary manner.

Not even the POTUS can decree a national medical emergency where none exists or otherwise do so in a capricious and arbitrary manner.

Expand full comment

Justin Bieber just cancelled the rest of his world tour for physical and mental reasons relating to his previous Ramsay Hunt Syndrome.

Expand full comment

Why high risk over 70's? This makes no sense. These jabs MUST be discontinued for ALL people, regardless of age or condition. Jabs that alter the immune system, DNA, and cause possible harms or death? C'mon, man!!!

Expand full comment

Dr Alexander; You keep advocating this poison for all people 70+. Are you trying to control MEDICARE spending by killing us off? I have my pneumonia, TDAP, & had annual flu shots.

I have not & will not take any injection with the MRNA so called technology.

We have followed Dr Zelenko’s protocols & have not gotten infected by the Fauci/CCP virus.

I have watched as friends have died from these injections & hospital protocols requiring REMDESIVIR.

No HCQ, IVERMECTIN or early treatment. Let me put this to you in my most subtle USMC retired Combat Officer vernacular. WE AINT GETTING THESE FUCKING SHOTS NO WAY OR NO HOW!

STOP ADVOCATING THIS POISON FOR THOSE OF US OVER 70! I trust you heard me loud & clear.

Thank you for your concern.⚔️🤬⚔️🤯⚔️

Expand full comment
Sep 6, 2022·edited Sep 6, 2022

Whoa! I'm a high-risk 70+ and I didn't need their stinking EUA crap! Most pharmaceutical drugs are poisons and have no business being put in a human body—with only a select few exceptions (Ivermectin a notable example!). EUA drugs to TREAT an outbreak MIGHT be useful, but safety testing on a short-term basis still makes them very risky, and there are probably plenty of existing drugs for any new pathogen that could be repurposed.

How about making it totally ILLEGAL to ever allow any "vaccine" to be classed as an EUA, because no vaccine should EVER be used during an outbreak, pandemic, or otherwise. A basic public health principle is you "never vaccinate into a pandemic" because all it does is breed mutations resistant to the shots! And NO vaccine is even reasonably effective against any RESPIRATORY virus, because injected vaccines do not create "mucosal immunity" where it needs to be to prevent respiratory infections. Which is why flu shots don't work, and the pharmaceutical companies lie about their efficacy. (Not to mention their contribution to the development of dementia by their aluminum and other highly toxic adjuvants). The entire concept of vaccines is flawed, and they mostly do more harm than good. They cause serious damage to immunity through antigenic priming and other deleterious effects.

Expand full comment