27 Comments

Im a licensed md in NY, NJ and Fl. I am an ophthalmologist . I have many patients who take hydroxychloroquine 200-400 mg PO q day to treat lupus and other auto immune conditions. The FDA does not and has not ever prohibited the the off label use of a drug that FDA has found to be safe as long as there is some evidence it could work and there is proper informed consent. The same with ivermectin.

In putting out “warnings” against these drugs , the fda acted hypocritically and completely abused its power and role . Thousands of people could have been saved by the timely administration of these drugs. The fda was acting under orders from some higher up political authority which was itself taking orders from vax makers (i dont know). There was never any reason to shut down debate on the possible use of IVM or HCQ. They could have sponsored open discussions with experts around the world. We know that HCQ can mitigate lung inflammation. There must be an accounting for why fda did this?

Expand full comment

It was blocked because if there are existing treatments you can’t get EUA.

Expand full comment

The big study they did in Brazil to prove that it wasn’t effective required that everyone in the control group NOT have had HCQ in the previous 24 hours before the beginning of the study.

They made that run because everyone there uses it prophylactically against malaria.

However, the half life of HCQ is more than 3 weeks, so the control group had just as much HCQ in their systems as the test subjects. So of course the study didn’t show any advantage. The study was designed to give a fraudulent result!!!

Expand full comment

They could have spared us so much needless expense, so much needless suffering and pain.what kind of hateful monsters that would perpetrate this on humanity for their selfish devious goals.

Expand full comment

Makes sense! Blocks the virus from entering the cell and reprogramming it.

Then we decide to reprogram cellular function with mRNA. ? Counterproductive to say the least!

Ba d Science Bad Medicine!

Expand full comment
Sep 17, 2022·edited Sep 17, 2022

As PhilH already stated: if ANY effective treatment exists, then an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) CANNOT be issued, and since the Globalist plan for planetary depopulation hinged on their COVID shot bioweapon deployment to a major part of humanity (something that is slow-acting so as not to alert the masses too soon that they are being exterminated, and possibly/probably irreversible so it cannot be removed or shut off—with effects such as the slow-growing white things clogging blood vessels) they could not allow anything to interfere with the EUA. Because of the lethality of the shots, they never warranted full approval (that Comirnaty WAS approved is testimate to the fraudulent nature of the fully-captured FDA) so it is quite probable that the shots would have never gotten any approval without getting the EUAs first, therefore those EUAs were absolutely critical to pulling off the entire bioweapon-shot scheme.

If hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin had been acknowledged as effective: NO EUAs and NO efficient mass depopulation program (and NO tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in fake vaccine sales)!

Expand full comment

Why? Because #TheCulling is the goal. HCQ was used against SARS-1 and China was trying it for SARS-2. I had it in a blog post before DJT mentioned it and then the anti-Trump media went nuts and then there was some fishtank product death leading to more bad press. That led to my ground-breaking post title: Eat Food – Antivirals are found in common foods. (March 24 2020) https://transcendingsquare.com/2020/03/24/eat-food-antivirals-are-found-in-common-foods/

And I have been pointing out ever since that the FDA cannot ban citrus peel or dandelions or evergreen needles, etc. EAT FOOD! (or make tea)

Expand full comment

I wonder what delayed the pubication of this paper by almost a year after it was submitted and received by the publisher 8 November 2021???

Expand full comment

No offense, but this is nothing new. It's well-known that HCQ is effective with decreasing covid symptoms, especially if taken early.

Obviously, Big Pharma didn't want HCQ used because then they wouldn't have been able to get an Emergency Use Authorization for their money-maker, the covid shot.

Expand full comment

Billion dollar question…..Why $$$

Expand full comment

Excerpt: "Stratifying patients by the level of lung cholesterol may reveal a benefit for HCQ and help avoid potential toxicity of HCQ in some cell types (Supplementary Fig. 1c, d). Cholesterol is typically measured in the blood, not the tissue. Blood is primarily a transient transport system and thus may not accurately predict years of accumulation in the lung of obese or chronically inflamed patients28,31. In conclusion, better diagnostics of cholesterol in lung tissue are needed to assess the ideal conditions for testing HCQ treatment."

HCQ dosing is not this damn touchy - what the heck!? measuring lung cholesterol? AYFKM!?

Am I reading this right? This paper is written to make it a big effing onerous deal and NO MENTION of the role of zinc.

Expand full comment

The VA retrospective actually showed a meaningful benefit to HCQ + AZ, something like 70%, even when given late, but they played statistical games to assert that it wasn’t statistically significant (comparing the 3 variables rather than just the HCQ+AZ to the control, hitch included AZ half the time) and the fraudulently stated “no benefit”.

The lack of intellectual and scientific integrity with medicine and science generally (although already clear in the climate change frauds) was eye opening.

Expand full comment