AGAIN, Scandalous & outrageous! That Bourla & Pfizer did not know that COVID vaccine could stop transmission & DID NOT test that? This was all lies; they said will stop transmission; Dr. John Campbell
AGAIN, Scandalous & outrageous! That Bourla & Pfizer did not know that COVID vaccine could stop transmission & DID NOT test that? This was all lies; they said will stop transmission; Dr. John Campbell
but they did not know it would and as we have seen, it DOES not! we were cancelled when we said it, yet now it is told to us we were correct! Pfizer, Moderna, CDC, NIH, FDA all LIED! criminals IMO
Dr (I think it's a great idea to mass inject everyone with an experimental vaccine) Campbell is stunned.
It really is going to be hard to listen to all these proclaimed 'smart people' discovering the truth. As they declare it is only apparent now that this was an absolutely terrible idea.
The fact it was a dreadful idea has been bloody obvious from day one!
Poor Dr. Campbell. I am worried about him. He has diligently attemped to make sense of the covid vaxxes, when it was near impossible. But now when a Pfizer exec, head of Int’l sales, tells the EU (world), Pfizer sold millions of doses of their product despite having no idea whether it would stop transmission. Wow, that was a big, awful admission. Well folks, it looks like this was definitely the straw that broke Dr. John Campbell’s back. It would not surprise me if he packs it in. The Pfizer criminal behaviour is very difficult to make sense of Dr. Campbell. Don’t even try.
And yet, not a word from mainstream media or any Canadian politician. Am so glad I trusted my own instincts and refused these shots. And so grateful for all the real " experts" like Dr. Alexander and their very sound advice.
In my province of British Columbia they are still pushing these shots and are throwing in the flu shot for good measure! One for each arm. Roll up your sleeves lol.
Here is the press conference (which hardly ANY press attended) of the 6 European members of parliament gave after this Pfizer revelation. Christian Terhes has been at the forefront of this and he is amazing. Another wonderful fighter is Christine Anderson the German MEP: Please watch it and share. It's a really eye opener.
Dr John never critically reads any of the reports that he discusses. The Pfizer trial report published by the FDA was pretty clear that none of the subjects were exposed to virus. You can't inform on efficacy without exposing the subjects to controlled, equal infection. Even then ,all they had was relative risk reduction. Absolute risk reduction 0.8%.
He took the Health Canada reports saying that the un vaccinated were getting infected at face value in spite of the fact that it stated right on the graphs that it was data from Dec. 13, 2020.
In fairness, doctors are not trained to read scientific papers. Most read only the title headline or the abstract at most.
Safety must come first, enough time and adequate randomized control trials must be required because it is clear there is not informed consent, but misleading from all levels of government, from the media, and influencers (who were influenced). There is a standard procedure for clinical trials for a reason, and many feel even these are inadequate because only favorable clinical trials out a set of them are reported on.
But, first I make comments that make sense if the official narrative is correct.
Strictly, the female executive from Pfizer said “the vaccine didn’t prevent immunisation” (I think, not “didn’t prevent transmission”).
That said, there were no clinical trials launched that could have been used to establish an impact on transmission.
Arguably, we knew for certain that blockade of transmission couldn’t happen when it was stated that vaccinated & unvaccinated people had similar peak “viral loads” in their airways (cycle threshold in PCR was the same in both groups).
Taking a step back, it’s known that, even if the virus narrative was correct, vaccination could never have worked & thus was never an appropriate response to a claimed pandemic.
How do we know this? Well, consider why the elderly are particularly vulnerable to these illnesses: it’s thought that the aging immune system is the root cause. Why, then, would we expect a good response to a vaccine? All that is is a controlled way of exposing the immune system to a novel pathogen. Well, we don’t see good responses to such vaccines. A dirty secret is that influenza vaccines do not reduce hospitalisation or death. That’s right. They’re fraud too.
So the entire proposition was fraud. A rushed injected vaccine couldn’t possibly have worked. And that’s what happened. They didn’t work. No one was saved.
I now no longer believe that there was a novel virus. The pattern of deaths is completely at odds with previously clear, annual episodes of super-proportional death rates with age. Denis Rancourt interview with Jerm Warfare makes all this clear.
To be clear, people were ill, people died. Not in dispute. Probably severe chronic stressed made it all worse. All I’m saying is, the epidemiologically tells us it wasn’t a novel virus that caused mass illness and deaths. There wasn’t anything new, only government lies.
It genuinely seems Dr John is shocked.
I thought he was aware of the truth but just working around uTube guidelines but it seems not.
I assume he is now waking up to the fact it’s been a monumental global con from the start
Deeply embarrassing for him I’m sad to say I suspect.
Dr (I think it's a great idea to mass inject everyone with an experimental vaccine) Campbell is stunned.
It really is going to be hard to listen to all these proclaimed 'smart people' discovering the truth. As they declare it is only apparent now that this was an absolutely terrible idea.
The fact it was a dreadful idea has been bloody obvious from day one!
Halfwits.
It’s not a vaccine. It’s an attack on the citizenry
Poor Dr. Campbell. I am worried about him. He has diligently attemped to make sense of the covid vaxxes, when it was near impossible. But now when a Pfizer exec, head of Int’l sales, tells the EU (world), Pfizer sold millions of doses of their product despite having no idea whether it would stop transmission. Wow, that was a big, awful admission. Well folks, it looks like this was definitely the straw that broke Dr. John Campbell’s back. It would not surprise me if he packs it in. The Pfizer criminal behaviour is very difficult to make sense of Dr. Campbell. Don’t even try.
And yet, not a word from mainstream media or any Canadian politician. Am so glad I trusted my own instincts and refused these shots. And so grateful for all the real " experts" like Dr. Alexander and their very sound advice.
In my province of British Columbia they are still pushing these shots and are throwing in the flu shot for good measure! One for each arm. Roll up your sleeves lol.
Here is the press conference (which hardly ANY press attended) of the 6 European members of parliament gave after this Pfizer revelation. Christian Terhes has been at the forefront of this and he is amazing. Another wonderful fighter is Christine Anderson the German MEP: Please watch it and share. It's a really eye opener.
Heres the link,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jTgDj7uiX8
https://www.facebook.com/Togetherwebond/videos/1163242590934654
This is good! Europe standing up to the madness!
Medical research for profit is an art form! Been going on for decades. Has now been finely honed. Read Science in the Private Interest. Kaminsky.
Readers may be interested in my article entitled: "Death by Medicine"
https://thomasabraunrph.substack.com/p/death-by-medicine
“speed of science” 😂😂😂
reminds me of the old Thomas Dolby classic...and somewhat fitting for this
“Mm, but she blinded me with science
(She blinded me with science!)
And failed me in biology, yeah”
I agree completely
It now seems he was “ blind” to what has patently evolved and that sadly I have to say therefore now reflects very badly on Dr John.
It’s not as if the data is hidden.
A blind man down a coal mine with the lights off on a dark night can see what is going on.
We all can.
Dr John never critically reads any of the reports that he discusses. The Pfizer trial report published by the FDA was pretty clear that none of the subjects were exposed to virus. You can't inform on efficacy without exposing the subjects to controlled, equal infection. Even then ,all they had was relative risk reduction. Absolute risk reduction 0.8%.
He took the Health Canada reports saying that the un vaccinated were getting infected at face value in spite of the fact that it stated right on the graphs that it was data from Dec. 13, 2020.
In fairness, doctors are not trained to read scientific papers. Most read only the title headline or the abstract at most.
The search for efficacy (Phase 2) has been prioritized before the check for safety (Phase 1).
This has also been pushed onto the general populous through "Real World Evidence" - https://leemuller.substack.com/p/did-phase-i-of-clinical-trials-which
If you're wondering how so many seeming good people readily accepted this, see: https://leemuller.substack.com/p/good-people-divided-and-an-explanation
Safety must come first, enough time and adequate randomized control trials must be required because it is clear there is not informed consent, but misleading from all levels of government, from the media, and influencers (who were influenced). There is a standard procedure for clinical trials for a reason, and many feel even these are inadequate because only favorable clinical trials out a set of them are reported on.
How could they know it doesn't stop transmission? These big pharma clowns don't even know how viruses are transmittable and cannot prove they are.
I no longer accept the virus narrative.
But, first I make comments that make sense if the official narrative is correct.
Strictly, the female executive from Pfizer said “the vaccine didn’t prevent immunisation” (I think, not “didn’t prevent transmission”).
That said, there were no clinical trials launched that could have been used to establish an impact on transmission.
Arguably, we knew for certain that blockade of transmission couldn’t happen when it was stated that vaccinated & unvaccinated people had similar peak “viral loads” in their airways (cycle threshold in PCR was the same in both groups).
Taking a step back, it’s known that, even if the virus narrative was correct, vaccination could never have worked & thus was never an appropriate response to a claimed pandemic.
How do we know this? Well, consider why the elderly are particularly vulnerable to these illnesses: it’s thought that the aging immune system is the root cause. Why, then, would we expect a good response to a vaccine? All that is is a controlled way of exposing the immune system to a novel pathogen. Well, we don’t see good responses to such vaccines. A dirty secret is that influenza vaccines do not reduce hospitalisation or death. That’s right. They’re fraud too.
So the entire proposition was fraud. A rushed injected vaccine couldn’t possibly have worked. And that’s what happened. They didn’t work. No one was saved.
I now no longer believe that there was a novel virus. The pattern of deaths is completely at odds with previously clear, annual episodes of super-proportional death rates with age. Denis Rancourt interview with Jerm Warfare makes all this clear.
To be clear, people were ill, people died. Not in dispute. Probably severe chronic stressed made it all worse. All I’m saying is, the epidemiologically tells us it wasn’t a novel virus that caused mass illness and deaths. There wasn’t anything new, only government lies.
may this be the trickle that starts the wall of lies to burst.
I watched Dr John in the early days. But gave it away because he was so pro vax. Good to see you have finally woken up Dr John.