Chin et al.: "Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System"; look at table S4, see no (zero) risk, deaths in natural immune prisoners, not championed by author
Chin et al.: "Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System"; look at table S4, see no (zero) risk, deaths in natural immune prisoners, not championed by author
Why have journal editors, researchers, still write fraud lies they do, why give an interpretation that does not fit the data? why did they not mention the potency of prisoner natural immunity here?
Chin et al.: "Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System"; look at table S4, see no (zero) risk, deaths in natural immune prisoners, not championed by author
Could not agree more Dr. A, the LAST thing one should even glance at are the conclusion sections in any of the studies that might have valid data able to pass the smell test. More often than not anymore the conclusions seem to be written as tacit support for the official narratives, whereas the data themselves tell a very different story altogether. But it requires one to make that deep dive into the data, perform some actual thinking & rational analysis, then draw one's own conclusions or inferences. Many do not feel they have the time nor the inclination to do that, let alone the preparation & skill set to conduct such a rigorous review.
One cannot develop immunity to this agent. One may develop a tolerance level though like happens with other toxins. IF it was natural and spread naturally, pretty much everyone would have been infected within three months in early 2020. Here we are three years later with both vaxxed and non-vaxxed still becoming sick. Injured have dwarfed deaths. Most injuries must be denied as being related in order to stay on script.
Chin et al.: "Protection against Omicron from Vaccination and Previous Infection in a Prison System"; look at table S4, see no (zero) risk, deaths in natural immune prisoners, not championed by author
Natural immunity. God always does it better
Could not agree more Dr. A, the LAST thing one should even glance at are the conclusion sections in any of the studies that might have valid data able to pass the smell test. More often than not anymore the conclusions seem to be written as tacit support for the official narratives, whereas the data themselves tell a very different story altogether. But it requires one to make that deep dive into the data, perform some actual thinking & rational analysis, then draw one's own conclusions or inferences. Many do not feel they have the time nor the inclination to do that, let alone the preparation & skill set to conduct such a rigorous review.
Reminds me of mask studies. Data and discussion do not support their use against viruses yet the conclusion does.
One cannot develop immunity to this agent. One may develop a tolerance level though like happens with other toxins. IF it was natural and spread naturally, pretty much everyone would have been infected within three months in early 2020. Here we are three years later with both vaxxed and non-vaxxed still becoming sick. Injured have dwarfed deaths. Most injuries must be denied as being related in order to stay on script.