I haven't seen in any of your videos an explanation for why feminism has been so successful and what can be done to stop it. As far as I can tell at some point in the mid 19th century one group of white guys in power decided they could weaponize "penis envy" against their political opponents. But it's like using a biological weapon. Sure it may initially wipe out your enemy but then it quickly mutates and exterminates all human life on Earth.

Also Poilievre should have simply stated that they did nothing wrong in including the tags and that Incels and MGTOW are not misogynists. Clearly Incels do not hate women. They want the government to provide them with wives (although I after they did they would soon be lobbying the government to take the wives away :).

It doesn't matter how bad Trudeau is, if Poilievre splits the right he won't win. If he doesn't join with PPC, he will just have a repeat of the last election in which PPC took enough votes for Conservatives to loose. Doing things like alienating MGTOW, going to Ukraine rallies with the uniparty, being pro immigration are going to leave conservative voters who vote PPC voting PPC because those are some of the major issue that the PPC addresses. He's just making the same mistake to last leader did trying to court the liberal voters who will never vote for him anyway. He doesn't have a chance of getting voters who vote liberal or NDP to vote Conservative. They vote based on ideology not on issues. The votes he can win are the PPC votes.

Trudeau in contrast, despite having absolutely no populist appeal and being extremely unpopular, has been able to garner an immense amount of political will--much more than any Canadian Prime Minister in recent history. He has his minority government unquestionably propped up by the NDP for the next 3 years, has been able to usurp the power of law enforcement to have political opposition criminalized- proud boys-,has been able to enact martial law, use force to supress political opposition, and escape all accountability. It is highly unlikely he will loose the next election.

It seems like a no-win situation. Poilievre knows he may be able to win as a populist but he lacks the political will to govern as a populist so he is courting the elites, however by doing so he looses his populist appeal so will most likely loose the next election. Its hard to find a populist leader who can garner the political will to govern as a populist. Trump was able to do it for the first half of his presidency but lost the political will to govern as a populist when the other side demonstrated they were willing to do anything, including civil war, to regain power.

Most likely now that Poilievre is party leader he is a member of the ruling class so he is no longer interested in the plight of the common man but only in how he can manipulate the common man into servitude of the ruling class. His supporters were naive and believed a career politician to be principled. They should have known that he would say what ever it takes to get elected. Maybe now that he's crossed the floor George Soros will buy him a house Martha's Vineyard so that he can live in a style befitting a member of the aristocracy.

Also I've never heard you comment on Gavin McInnes' historical opinion that in the mid 1980s the feminists under the direction of Gloria Steinem shut down all the interest and hobby clubs. Humans are sexually dimorphic and as a result they have propensities to socialize in different ways. Males generally socialize around shared interests hence according to McInnes up until the mid 1980s our society was composed of lots and lots of special interests activity clubs run by mostly males that were structured around their individual shared interests. Women don't have a high propensity to socialize in this way the the feminists according McInnest shut down all the interest and hobby clubs in the mid 1980s. I've taken a lot of sociology courses but I've never read anyone other than McInnest talk about the feminists war on interest and hobby clubs in the mid 1980s. I would be very interested to hear your opinion on this matter as well as any supporting evidence.