I’m not surprised that you used an article by a jewish, OPENLY anti-White, pro-feminist psychologist who promotes the idea that there is such a thing as toxic masculinity.

Nor am I surprised that you acknowledged the capture of psychology by “postmodernism” (quite a euphemism there, lol. Like referring to black criminal mobs as “teens”), yet immediately - in the next sentence, no less - made an appeal to an authority of a jewish fella who promotes that same ideological agenda.

The reason I’m not surprised is that so many of our ideas have been given to us by the same people who get called “postmodernists,” “Marxists,” “leftists,” etc.

When your idea of evidence is to look for essays written by self-promoting ideologues - in other words, when you resort to “so-and-so says” - it should be a red flag to yourself that 1) you have a big gap in your knowledge base, and 2) you are opening yourself to ideologues rather than seeking direct knowledge.

You’re right that blacks do display personality traits that can be described as narcissistic. You’re mistaken about why.

They aren’t that way because of the absence of the black family. They are that way everywhere they live. It IS innate. Temperament is highly heritable and there are distinct racial differences in temperament that exist independently of culture.