I should have referenced this book in class, but the title eluded me then. Still it's amazing how a professor who should be acquainted with the most modern advancements in philosophy was too dumbfounded to defend the concept of biology being innate, only agreeing with the student who mentioned some form of barbaric sharia law (interesting how many forms of uncivilized brutality happen to often be related to the Islamic faith) as proof of morality's subjective nature. He even mentioned, without deigning to explain, how there is "an argument against biology". God only knows what that could be. Religion? Oh wait, god is dead; the ever so trusty discipline of science has proven that.