Thank you Michal, I appreciate the feedback. I take this all pretty seriously. I've had a network of trusted neuroscientists that I consult on papers like this to make sure I'm being scientifically accurate, and they rely on me to understand the interactive media implications of the work they do.

One of the biggest problems that major game devs have is that they don't hire scientists. Data scientists don't count as they don't need to know any science, they are engineers that can assist scientists, kind of like AI. Of course they will be some of the easiest white collar workers to replace with AI since AI can do math and statistics a lot faster.

But AI has a very difficult time reading/challenging research papers, as I've recently pointed out. And AI can tell you what has happened, but not what will happen.