I think you misunderstand what Matt is doing with this reporting. He is not reporting on the efficacy of Ivermectin or any other COVID treatment; he is revealing the daily assaults on open discussion of this and other issues by algorithm and partisan censorship on social and other media platforms. Whether Ivermectin has shown to be effective in this or that trial, or whether it has shown to be worthless, is not the subject of this article or the others he has written (at least three or four) that touch on the topic.

It is not his job to present both sides of the Ivermectin controversy; he's not actually covering it. He's covering the censorship controversy.