I love Caitlin's work when she discusses the US proxy war against Russia, and when she discusses how propaganda works. Actually, I even love her work when I disagree completely because I enjoy her bold, vivid prose.

But these statements were factually incorrect:

There's no such thing as an objective journalist. (CLOSE. There are people who strive for objectivity, as she later acknowledges.)

There's no such thing as a moral billionaire. (Well, no one's perfect, but some are a lot more moral than others.)

There's no such thing as a humanitarian intervention. (When did she become a libertarian? I thought she was a Marxist who got annoyed when people "babble about Stalin and Mao" and other socialist mass murderers, suppressors of free speech, institutors of gun control, and creators of societies where you are not allowed to leave.)

There's no such thing as an honest war. (What about a defensive war? Look up "Just War criteria." Many people have formulated sincere doctrines that involve self-defense. If Anne Frank had been able to fight back, that would have been a just war.)

Even though sometimes she overgeneralizes, I know she does it to get us to think, because if she is actually this rigid and ideological, I am sure circumstances will make her more flexible. Example: she sided with Elon Musk recently in his attempts to open up Twitter to free speech, if that is what he is doing, because the regime needs to be exposed as using Twitter as a psy-opp.