Many, MANY, people were either naive about the injections, or were too willing to justify to themselves a "Small" (they thought) risk, in order to travel freely or keep their jobs. I don't think it is fair to criticize anybody too harshly for that -- including Dr. Malone and Steve Kirsch. Where did Dr. Malone say there is no evidence of purposeful intent? I've never gotten the impression he thinks this was all some big mistake. Have you read his recent post pointing out DARPA's complicity? https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=583200&post_id=106229677 While it is true that nobody should be above criticism, I think you're casting unfounded aspersions. Yes, there are people who are weakening the medical freedom movement, but they seem most often to be "No virus and no Covid" zealots, not the prominent people in this effort. Point of clarification regarding your earlier comments: Blockchain is only an auditable ledger system that does not automatically identify anyone, personally. However, the applications using it may provide personal information, depending on how they are written. Though I'm not a fan of cryptos, I do support the purposes for which some of them were created, and I share your concerns about CBDC's and digital ID. There are many shortcomings in BTC and other cryptocurrencies that their supporters find inconvenient to address; it seems the lure of quick riches and a false sense of invincibility make it easier to rationalize participation in a mania. For now, I'll stick with real money (metals) and avoid some of the manipulative turbulence from Chinese whales and Wall Street banks.