how could these kids be less well served by a system that at least demands quality than by the system we have today? could it provide worse education, outcomes, and guidance? nothing is going to make a 30th percentile kid a star, but at least this could give them a chance. competition breeds competence. very fee people know much about microwave ovens, but competition ensures that it's basically impossible to buy a bad one. all products, including schools, benefit from such systems.