a pleasing thought. "blink twice if you're being held regulatory hostage." alas, this seems too comfortable down the middle of the post modernist fairway to likely be such. ms lee does not appear to be trying to play simplico to criticize the powers that be without admission of so doing but rather genuinely seems mired in the non-objectivist quagmire of deconstructionism's pretty word games and the propagandistic possibilities they generate.

hers is a "how to" manual for refuting scientists with propaganda by defining scientific method as "just one way of presenting data" and acting as though skepticism and a desire to peer more deeply into data is some human weakness being cunningly exploited by the anti-maskers in contradiction of orthodoxy.

her very statement about "using orthodox scientific methods to support unorthodox conclusions" speaks volumes here as in it's presumptions that the conclusions of orthodoxy are somehow intrinsically valid despite not being rooted in orthodoxy methods of scientific knowing.

this is the logical equivalent of palming a card in 3 card monte.