this seems a puzzling comment.

the former is, to be sure, an issue but we can push back on it with ends to unsupervised mail in and more citizen supervision. ultimately, this should be verifiable and electronic using some sort of 2 sided system (possibly blockchain) that allows votes to be indelibly and verifiably cast only by those with permission.

the second, however, is half the topic of the piece. i explicitly state that you cannot trust donkey or elephant or the puppet show of issues over which they purport to fight. i'm therefore sort of confused that you see this as an unaddressed issue when it was a full blown central point.

i might recommend that you read this again with a bit more care.

this is the whole underpinning of why i advocate one issue voting and one and only one question:

“what will you do to reduce the federal bureaucracy and free us from its yoke?”