By your second sentence it is obvious you do not understand what a critical review of a book/ research is. It seems you believe that if I read the book I will see all this “data” he provides and I will be convinced. To truly review the book would mean I don’t just look at the graphs, nor accept his interpretation of the research, I would have to read and comprehend said studies myself. Many experts have done so and report that he misrepresents many findings (perhaps because he has an agenda or he doesn’t understand the outcomes or conclusions, or he could be lying?) Providing long lists of sources (“data, trials, stats and facts”) should not be taken at face value. The supporting data needs to be scrutinized by experts (peer reviews etc.) Sadly, most people are not capable of such in depth reviews and “ believe what they see and hear” that which is presented to them, especially if it coincides with their own worldview.

I guess my question to you would be: why are you so convinced by RFK Jr , a person with no scientific, medical or research background, and who has a long standing reputation of being untruthful and a conspiracy theorist. You obviously are capable of being more of a skeptic when it comes to the claims by those pushing the gender ideology agenda and harming children. Why are you so convinced that RFK Jr got the facts right?

But maybe don’t answer. It is probably best to agree to disagree.