A Ginni Coefficient of Zero is meaningless if everyone is equally poor.
As stated on this forum previously:
"I think the honorable gentlemen knows that I have the same contempt for his Socialist policies as the people of East Europe who have experienced it [...]. I think I must have hit the right nail on the head when I pointed out that the logic of those policies are they’d rather have the poor poorer. Once they start to talk about the gap, they’d rather the gap be [indicates an everything lower gap]. Not up here [indicates an everybody higher gap]. But that [indicates an everything lower gap] So long as the gap is smaller, they’d rather have the poor poorer. "
It's a great rebuttal. Brutal takedown, in fact. Should be required viewing for every voter.