Mass Formation.

I think that physicians should have some experience in order to weigh in on this. I just don't think that they should be the gatekeeper of it. Do you remember when doctors would encourage a second opinion?

My experience has shown me that the doctor doesn't even understand what she is pushing. When I had the vaccine conversation with my doctor it was painful as to how silly their rationales were. I broke down my reasons for not taking the vaccine into simple reasons.

1. It was experimental.

2. It had yet to be researched for long term effects

3. Why did I need it since I already had Covid twice.

4. It apparently does not stay confined to one area of the body.

5. It did not stop infection or transmission

Her explanation as to why it made it through so quick was daunting. She said that the main hold up for the vaccine was bureaucracy, and they had managed to cut through it in record time. I told her that you can't hurry long term effects research for obvious reasons. The bureaucracy argument does hold up some of the process, but the reason for the bureaucracy in this case makes sense. a new substance needs to be extensively tested.

She also stated that the assurance that the vaccine would only stay in one part of the body was ridiculous, and I agreed with her on that notion.

In regards to the infection/transmission concern, she really didn't comment, but I do remember she said something along the lines of it preventing more serious symptoms, in other words, towing the company line of the narrative. But again, if I already know that I could handle Covid without the vaccine anyhow, then why do I need to take it?