You keep excusing things by asserting that's the way they are and have been. Then, sadly, the government has always been unconstitutional?

Just because reps vote on issues affecting not only the states they live in, does not mean they should, or that such a thing is constitutional. I certainly would not want California politicians voting on things that won't fly down her in Georgia and vice versa. Isn't it very clear after three years that one-size-fits-all is clumsy and a horrible way to run a country the size and scope as ours? Wouldn't more autonomy broken up into smaller areas and regions be better than more central control?

While federal reps do vote on issues that affect me whether I like it or not, and that is reality, that doesn't mean it is true. There are a lot of things in this life that are real but predicated on falsehood. I can say repeatedly that the vaccine is safe and effective..and that mantra is real, but it is not true. That more people adopt the idea that it is, also is not true. Truth has no bearing on the amount of people who believe it.

The problem here is misinterpreting reality as true. But I understand your world view, and that you want to use ad hominem attacks who do not believe as you do. I will accept the moniker of ignorant and a wishful thinker, and you can safely discard whatever it is I have to say based on it. I noticed how you didn't engage with the definitions of the word "libertarian" and notice the dichotomy of what the "reality" of libertarian party is.