I could not agree more. This sort of rationale can only be entertained by those who have the privilege of living in "hypotheticals" where one's moral laziness has the privledge of hiding behind banal platitudes like "the independent actions consenting adults." Did you he consider that not everyone in a park or on the internet is a "consenting adult" and that inadvertently exposing minors to such content could be physchologically disturbing? Or are the debacherous activities of adults and their feelings about "free expression" which now apparently extends to anal sex for all to see (not because we all agreed that free speech should include lewd videos, but because technology made it possible to include far more than the written or spoken word) more important than a parents right to address such topics in an age appropriate manner?