"Cowardice" it's a conundrum. For the very acme of "cowardice" in my social circles is any "attack" on women and children. By a man. The cleverness of feminists has been to ever widen what is seen as an "attack" on women and children. On the traditional level this sort of thing included not putting women and children first, not being a good provider, etc. All of which of course remains the exact same but now with added forms of horrors such as not cheering on women's footballers or not stumping up money for any number of women's causes or even suggesting "due process" for Male defendants. Just as mother Pankhurst handed out white feathers in the modern world there are a shed load of ways men can be labelled "cowards" if they don't tow the line. After all the animus against MGTOW is really that they are cowardly ducking out of their moral responsibility to support women and children. For what could be more cowardly than just "looking after no. 1" ? The clever manipulation of shaming men has to be one of the huge successes of feminism. After all when in Germany and Sweden an influx of people from a very different culture led to "harrassment" feminists there didn't say women should use their "power" and see off the upstarts, no they berated German and Swedish men for not seeing off these pests. And no doubt a parade of policemen and politicians were suitably shamed for not manning up sufficiently.