Yes I was actually a bit taken aback by this article, all bristling with come on everybody you need to open your eyes to the actual science/data. Then he takes a savage swipe at Wakefield as if he has come straight out of the provaxx-nothing-to-see-here-crowd. It's all very well citing your sciencey studies, but the evidence from individual cases is overwhelming that taking the vaxx triggered onset of autism. Plus, well, I'm not going to say read JB Handley, but if you have read it, and you're still talking that way, then I don't know what you are doing with all the hard evidence that the government has admitted liability in at least some cases, and the backstory is shocking. Plus the suppressed Atlanta study. So yeah, this is a very very very difficult business, and bad cattitude has exhibited a bad attitude, in my view, in slicing and dicing Wakefield this way. Seems a pity, like bad cattitude lost his mojo there for a moment. Sure, cite the studies, but there's no need to pile on wakefield like that, it only demonstrates you haven't really looked at his whole case.