And there's the tell. The population was not "desperate." The media was used to create a fear in them that was beyond unwarranted. If in prior years the media had pushed the CDC's estimated influenza burden numbers the same way they did with Covid, people would be likewise terrified of flu - but most are not. It was all a psyop.

As for the shots, if anyone cared to read even Pfizer's own animal studies (prior to phase 3 clinical trials) it was apparent that there was no benefit whatsoever to their shots (and it doesn't matter wether it was mRNA or modified adenovirus - they operate via the same mechanisms), nor could there be.

My "screed" regarding the shots is actually very highly documented from primary sources, but it is rather long, so I'll summarize for you here. First off, the shots don't directly stimulate the immune system - they induce the body's cells to manufacture the viral spike protein. Second, this spike protein is released into the blood stream where studies showed the body's response was a rapid rise in IgG - a *memory* antibody, meaning the body had already seen this protein or something very similar (if it was an initial infection response, studies would have shown a much more rapid initial rise in IgM). Third, this rise in blood-borne IgG is completely irrelevant, because the two main defenses against a respiratory virus are T-cells (which were only minutely, if at all, activated in response to the shot-generated spike), and IgA which is not at all activated by the shots (there's little evidence any of the studies even tested for IgA activation). IgA is the antibody used in the lungs by the body to fight off a respiratory virus. Lastly, studies (you can easily find one from the Salk Institute) showed that simply by virtue of binding to ACE2 receptors on cells, the Covid spike protein damaged those cells. Know where you find a whole lotta ACE2 receptors? The endothelium - the cells lining the blood vessels wherein the shot-induced spikes would circulate. I'm sure you can put two and two together to figure out what will happen to someone when a significant quantity of Covid spike protein is generated by the bodies cells and end up circulating in the blood stream.

The excuse of lack of understanding, desperation, and ignorance is all subterfuge. The "experts" knew exactly what they were doing, and they used lies along with the force and fury of government and regulatory and licensing agencies to keep most medical professionals in-line. "It's the CDC's guidance" after all. "The FDA approved it" (well, that word was misused quite often - it was emergency use authorized). And we trust the FDA, right? They'd never take safe medicines off the market or leave unsafe ones on the market, right? I mean, there are no disclaimers at the end of any pharmaceutical commercials, and all the drugs work just like they say, right? Right?

As for physicians feeling "compelled to provide some answers to the Covid 'crisis'" (it was not a crisis at all - it was not even, by definition, a pandemic - most people who died died from medical malpractice, not the virus), the wisest answers came from physicians and medical professionals who chose to stand up against the system. Most of them lost jobs, careers, were maligned and cast out, but they stood up for what was right because it was right.

This has nothing to do with superiority - I am "superior" to no one. I simply looked at the *actual* science, not the government- and media-approved narrative. This has to do with truth, and the government, and the "experts," and the "authorities" rejected truth in favor of power. It's that simple.