It only makes sense if you're working from the position that these vaccines could never do lasting and profound harm to the developing brain. That vax typically contains 850microgram of AL

Which, can most certainly damage the infant brain.

HOW THEN could we ever honestly assess any baseline neurological functioning for any child when we are arguably exposing them to the risk of neurological injury AT BIRTH?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29751176/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27501128/

NOTE:: THE IMMUNE SYSTEM PLAYS A VITAL ROLE IN BRAIN DEVELOPMENT THROUGH THE LIFESPAN.

What happens when you disorder immune function at birth with an unnecessary and harmful injection? AT BIRTH?

Also -- I read medical records for a living for various reasons. I have seen firsthand hospitals administer the HepB vax at birth despite 1) a negative HepB test on file for mom, 2) despite a baby being born premature and being WAY under the recommended weight for the shot, meaning it is CONTRAINDICATED (unfortunately this poor baby died at 5 months old, but do you think anyone gave side eye to her being given contraindicated treatment by hospital staff? Or even pondered that as part of what could have contributed to her death?? I'll give ya 3 guesses, and the first 2 don't count), and 3) despite a parent giving a firm and clear directive that she was refusing that injection.

Your comment paints the HepB at birth as having validity in a risk/benefits analysis, and being painted as malicious based on a layman's misunderstanding all of these complex social issues. It is neither. It is an unnecessary assault on the infant brain at birth, which has life long consequences for many. I can think of few things as malicious as that.