As I said before, we are being studied. This is more about how to manipulate us through communication than it is about anything else.

In my state, one of the first things that caught my attention.....during the supposed early crisis stage of the pandemic, our CDC director (past Soros Fellow) took time out of his busy role as the CDC director updating the state regularly, to appear before the Natural Resource Council of Maine. And in doing so, he explained that part of what was being done was "messaging" and the importance of messaging. That is, he stated that like the "climate change" narrative/approach it was critical to convince the public to participate in vaccination for their neighbor, for their community, for the elderly, etc. He basically was advocating not a rational response or argument but was putting forth an emotional appeal and expressing how that could be used to make the masses do what they otherwise might not do. On its face, one might think that is not so bad----but in reality it is a whole lot of manipulation especially if that is the principle means used to essentially get people to act how you want them to and also to compel them to mistreat others who do not act in the same fashion.

The second part of this approach...weaponizing those who are compliant against their peers is the nasty underside that they do not want to talk about. And when it comes to "apologies" and moving on.....rest assured that what is going to happen is an appeal to the emotions once again. It will be argued that the people who did get vaccinated did so because they are good humans and those of us who did not, we just got lucky and are still despicable people who would not throw ourselves on the altar for our neighbors. Missing from this entire discussion will be any basis for believing or not believing what the powers that be gave us as reliable information (which clearly it was not).