Did you see my comment on Meryl Nass’ substack regarding the clip of Tom Bancel’s reference to 100,000 doses and upping production to a billion doses because a pandemic is coming? Everyone is busy debating the context....while missing the obvious. Some say, he isn’t referring to COVID vaccines. Some say that even though a pandemic had not been declared, by January (when Davos happens) it was clear elsewhere in the world that a virus was on the loose. But here is the thing..... Even if those two things are true... Explain to me how it is that Bancel upon. Ok’ing back from Davos seems so self assured that there will not be any drugs, repurposed or otherwise, already available to battle the virus? How come he clearly has a mindset at that time that the production (billion doses) will be needed or desireable? He is in the pharma business....he clearly knows that clinical trials are long and involved. After all, Moderna was incorporated in 2010 and had failed precipitously for the better part of a decade in failing to bring to market any product. Despite their hype on the mRNA technology they had failure in clinical trials. His comment would suggest that he knows an EUA will be in the mix, but again....how could that be? After all, docs in the US and elsewhere had yet to really try to counter the virus and it’s symptoms/harm with what was already available. So...I’m my mind, his statement is an admission that he knew full well that the shock and fear campaign was about to be unleashed and that those who would narrate the crisis had already decided that this would be a perfect opportunity to do a global clinical trial and make huge $$$$ for future research of a technology that had this far failed to live up to its promise of making them able to “engineer man’s own evolution.” When you look at all the supposed mitigation efforts....social distancing, masking, lockdowns, constant counting on the news of those who died and later....how many unvaccinated died....you can see that the measures were clearly designed to get the shot into as many as possible. And if one wonders why it had to be everyone....I still think that was largely about muddying the waters for the general public and masking the obvious problems with the vaccine that have now become apparent. If they had only vaccinated one group...like the elderly, it would have been much easier to zero in on safety signals. Good for thought.