I wouldn’t say “most.” There are still dr.s that love their patients like family. They are not all completely convinced the shots are poisonous. They are not pushing boosters to guarantee negative side effects. I can’t believe that scenario or vast unethical complicity. Most Dr.s don’t have time to research this on their own and they are working 8-12 hours a day. All their, in the face, info from med. journals & protocols from hospital boards, is a calculated narrative. If a Dr. disagrees or wants to question treatment, their license is on the line. Not just that but their pension would be gone, and any litigation that happens, the dr. has to pay for both sides witnesses & all court costs. ( I just found this out, I had no idea) In other words, if a Dr. is found to have prescribed Ivermectin, against hospital Covid protocols, the prosecutors may need. special witnesses flown in for the case- or other expenses. The doctor being accused, pays all of this, ( here’s the kicker), EVEN if the Dr. wins!

This isn’t our normal judicial system, this is the state medical board & it’s run a whole different way.

I’m just trying to make the point that not all, not even majority of dr.s are pushing Big Pharma for their own benefit. Especially if they think it will hurt their patient. I might be wrong, but I hope not.