I'm not saying that there is an "evident immune dysfunction seemingly related to mRNA shots", am I? Immunity is always a delicate balance between missing pathogens and cancer cells OR autoimmunity. And there are most likely many complex mechanisms behind this (several are known and have been demonstrated in the lab but many others are not known or are unproven hypotheses). The repetitive antigen exposure effect on immune cell epigenetics seems pretty well established. I don't claim I know it all better because this science is still very immature. But I do know it's very immature and all my predictions have become true because they were built upon the most essential observations and at least the essence of immunity and evolutionary biology. If I could get it right, then what does that say about the official experts? And no. No new vaccines are not going to solve this. Unknowingly people are looking for eternal life. The Covid pandemic could have passed largely without interventions and turned endemic. Yes many people would have died. But many people would have died anyway. Most covid deaths were deaths "with covid". We don't know the end result. But knowing that a natural coronavirus pandemic would have probably only weeded out mostly the weak elderly, like HCOV-OC43 did, and seeing the results of intervention, I'm betting the objective conclusion in a couple of decades will be that the cure was worse than the disease. And that does not even include the effects on society. And since there is absolutely no proof that my bet is wrong, it should be considered the default outcome. So the solution is : there is no solution. It's life and death. If either mRNA or the repetitive use of it or the repetitive infections at short interval lead to what you call immune dysfunction, then there will still be many other unknown mechanisms to counter that in a large number of people. For example, the virus might become a latent infection like with HCMV. Or many people will die of a Covid-AIDS but a large group with (epi)genetic differences will survive. I'm not saying that's a great outcome but we do live in a dangerous way. We are constantly exposed to thousands of pathogens and many opportunistic ones in our own body. We constantly produce (pre-)cancerous cells. There's only one certainty: death. I'm not against research. I find it extremely interesting. Including all the covid and vaccine related research. But there is so much that should be researched. The obsession with covid and in particular vaccines should stop. I'm in favour of novel evidence-based medical treatments. But they need to be personalized for treatment or prevention for particular persons at real risk. Thus they must have a very clear proven benefits-risks advantage - also long-term if that is relevant. Any large scale interventions, like mass vaccinations, need to be done very very cautiously, with sufficient proof that also ecological-evolutionary aspects are well understood - like I have argued from the start. If we had done that for the covid jabs, then they wouldn't have been approved (yet). Now we did a huge experiment that may be turning really bad. But how many people will know this? Your suggestion unfortunately falls in the same trap of overestimated knowledge. Unless it will take decades to apply and then it will probably be obsolete. And sorry I'm not going to describe here what my plan would be to get us out of this mess with the minimum damage. That would require a whole book. And nobody is going to apply it anyway. Because in the end it's all about money and politics.