Here’s my problem: Feminists constantly say that men must express their emotions in the same way that women do. Yet when they do feminists are eager to define those emotions as inherently evil, and to support the position that expressing them is terrorism.

It seems to me that when individual men, who may or may not define themselves as incels, engage in acts of violence against women feminists are eager to define such acts as evidence that there is a movement of involuntarily celibate men engaged in a war on women. This is the purest, most malodorous, bullshit (or perhaps “cowshit” since no true feminist would want to be associated with a male animal).

A comparable attack by a woman on a man on men will be excused as justifiable, and undeserving of punishment. But that’s not the point. Feminism as a movement appears to be aiming at defining all forms of maleness as criminal. When agencies of state support this the result is devastating for men, which appears to be an objective of the feminist movement.

Such hatred must be stigmatized, and there needs to be real emotional support, and empathy given to isolated young men. What do to bet that a not a single feminist will support this, and most will oppose it. Doubly so when the men in question belong to already marginalized groups. This is inhuman, and, frankly, evils