Your first point is very valid on the surface, but ... I think that perhaps that view is a bit on the negative side (though I wholly appreciate where it comes from). I think it also depends on what you are really hoping to accomplish, and on what level.

In my mind, my very existence is in opposition to their goals. I have a medical doctorate and have not taken the vaxx. Although I am far less vocal than you are about it, I do gladly and readily tell anyone I encounter what I know from my research (beginning in 2021 with the brilliant summary by Doc Spartacus). I'm not shy about discussing the vaxx with people, and I'm able to do so without alienating them.

I can see that you're across the pond ... Over here, we have a phrase, which is probably more legend than fact: Three percent. This refers to the supposed fact that only 3% of the American colonists actually bothered to stand up to British rule, thus sparking the revolution and founding the USA. Again, it's probably totally bogus and certainly whitewashed in the extreme, but it's a worthwhile rallying cry. Another way to look at the same concept might be the 80/20 rule. Sure, 80% of the population are blithering sheep, but they only cause 20% of the problems for the WEF crowd. The 20% who are not sheep give them 80% of the grief. In this case, it might even be 90/10 or above ... That's enough to keep me motivated ;)

As to subsequent plans ... I don't know. Nuclear disaster would not create a fun paradise for the WEF ghouls to live out their days, nor would any other non-voluntary dystopia. I think that they WANT you (us) to believe that their rule is inevitable, so that you (we) will CHOOSE their oppression.

It's all about choice ... Obviously my post is skeeving off SOMETHING in the algorithm, because it keeps giving me an error message. Hmm!